UNIT 5: Evaluating Abstract

Pada Course kali ini Anda akan latihan mengevaluasi abstract jurnal.

Course Detail

Berikut ini detail mengenai course evaluating abstract.

  • Course ID: Evaluating Abstract (ditulis pada Lembar Aktivitas Mahasiswa)
  • CPMK: Melalui course ini, Anda diharapkan dapat:
    • Memahami struktur penulisan abstrak jurnal
    • Memahami konten abstrak jurnal
    • Memberikan penilaian berdasarkan instrumen evaluasi
    • Menjelaskan ulang konten abstrak jurnal
  • Lesson: Berikut ini Lesson yang terkait dengan Course ini.
  • Media: Berikut ini media yang dapat digunakan:
    • muhaiminabdullah.com
    • Online dictionaries (Oxford, Cambridge) and Thesaurus
    • Apple Keynote & Microsoft Power Point
    • Youtube
    • Telegram
  • Assessment (Bobot):
    • Konten: Menjelaskan (secara lisan/tertulis) konten/isi abstrak jurnal dengan tema pendidikan guru (35%)
    • Bahasa: Menjelaskan (secara lisan/tertulis) struktur abstrak jurnal (35%)
  • Alokasi Waktu: 2 pertemuan

Detail Aktivitas

Berikut ini rangkaian aktivitas yang berkaitan dengan Course ini.

Rubrik Evaluasi Abstrak

Berikut ini rubrik yang dapat Anda gunakan dalam mengevaluasi abstrak yang Anda pilih.

Abstract Evaluation Rubric by Manchester University

Kriteria Poin: 0 Poin: 1 Poin: 2 Poin: 3
Statemen Pembuka Missing Unclear; Doesn’t connect to literature Clear, but not engaging; Attempts to connect to literature Clear, concise, engaging; Describes, connects the topic to literature and purpose of work
Tujuan Missing Unclear; Contains irrelevant or unimportant information Clear but not concise; Might contain irrelevant or unimportant information; lacks specifics Clear, concise, and relevant
Pendekatan Metodologis Missing Not mentioned but implied; or, not appropriate for purpose of scholarship Unclear or not connected to purpose of scholarship Connected to the purpose of the scholarship; Identifies method used to support thesis or answer the research question
Hasil/Temuan Missing Unclear; Or not related to the purpose of the scholarship; Or misinterpretation of results Attempts to present findings but might be unclear; or some information missing Clear, connected to the purpose of scholarship; Provides explanation of what was expected, discovered, accomplished, collected, produced
Kontribusi Missing Unclear and lacks detail of contribution to the discipline Attempts to connect work to discipline, but might be unclear Clearly states how work advances knowledge in the discipline, why it is important
Gramatikal Grammatical errors, typos impede understanding; inappropriate verb tense Many grammatical errors, typos but they do not impede understanding; inappropriate verb tense Few grammatical errors or typos; Mixed verb tense Writing appropriate for the profession; Defines all acronyms at first use; Appropriate verb tense (present/past tense when talking about the study, may use future tense for the contribution to the discipline.
Panjang 200 - 300 kata

Abstract Evaluation Rubric by Bowling Green State University

Kriteria Tidak Memuaskan (0) Memuaskan (2) Sangat memuaskan (3)
Pembuka The subject and purpose are not obvious Author describes the main subject and purpose of the research/project and indicates why the research/project is important Places the research/project in a larger topical context
Metodologi Methods are not obvious Author describes what they did: data sources and methods of data collection are provided Convinces the reader that the methods employed were appropriate to the research/project.
Hasil Results are not presented clearly Author describes what they learned, and provides outcomes for the main results or an explanation of why no results were achieved Relates the results to the research/project question
Bahasa Conclusion is unclear Author describes the correlation between the research/project and its results, and the conclusions, anticipated or final, that they draw from the research/project Describes how this work will contribute to the field
Format Contains more than three formatting errors or is not submitted by the requested deadline Contains less than three formatting errors and is submitted by the requested deadline Formatted exactly as specified by the CRL (Center for Research and Learning) guidelines

Out of Class Activity

  • Baca keseluruhan konten dari masing-masing abstrak yang Anda pilih.
  • Analisis masing-masing abstrak. Hasil analisis dituliskan dalam tabel berikut.
Aspect Konten Nilai - Alasan
Introduction Diisi dengan latar belakang penelitian dengan menggunakan bahasa Anda sendiri - bukan meng-copy-paste hasl penelitian dalam abstract Diisi dengan angka (sesuai rubrik yang dipilih - Manchester university atau Bowling Green State University). Penilaian disertai alasan mengapa Anda memberi nilai tersebut.
Methodology Diisi dengan metode penelitian atau instrumen penelitian (observasi, wawancara, dsb.) sesuai dengan informasi yang diberikan peneliti/penulis didalam abstrak Diisi dengan angka (sesuai rubrik yang dipilih - Manchester university atau Bowling Green State University). Penilaian disertai alasan mengapa Anda memberi nilai tersebut.
Result Diisi dengan hasil penelitian dari abstrak yang Anda pilih dengan menggunakan bahasa Anda sendiri - bukan meng-copy-paste hasl penelitian dalam abstrak Diisi dengan angka (sesuai rubrik yang dipilih - Manchester university atau Bowling Green State University). Penilaian disertai alasan mengapa Anda memberi nilai tersebut.
Contribution Tuliskan kontribusi (atau potensi kontribusi) penelitian terhadap studi Anda

In-Class Activity

  • Pada pertemuan berikutnya, presentasikan hasil pekerjaan Anda dengan berdasar pada poin-poin berikut:
    • Apa latar belakang abstrak yang Anda pilih?
    • Menurut Anda, mengapa penelitian tersebut penting untuk dilakukan?
    • Apa saja hasil penelitian yang diinformasikan melalui abstrak?
    • Apa kontribusi atau potensi kontribusi hasil penelitian tersebut terhadap studi Anda?
  • Setiap mahasiswa(i) diberikan waktu 5 menit untuk memaparkan pemahamannya
  • Waktu 5 menit yang diberikan sudah termasuk sesi tanya-jawab
  • Presenter berhak tidak menjawab apabila jawaban dari pertanyaan tidak diinformasikan didalam abstrak yang dipilih

Penilaian

  • Tugas tertulis Anda akan dinilai berdasarkan akurasi informasi yang disampaikan dalam abstrak dan apa yang Anda sampaikan dalam tugas.
  • Presentasi dilakukan dalam bahasa Inggris dan akan dinilai berdasarkan penguasaan materi yang disajikan atau berdasarkan keakuratan informasi (accuracy) serta kelancaran dalam penyampaian (fluency). Target utama dari presentasi adalah latihan & membiasakan diri dengan presentasi akademik dalam bahasa Inggris. Dengan kata lain, performa Anda akan dinilai berdasarkan usaha dan upaya Anda dalam belajar, bukan berdasarkan kesempurnaan. Kesalahan mengeja kata tidak masuk dalam aspek penilaian.

Contoh

Berikut ini contoh aktivitas "Evaluating Abstract". Pada poin berikut ini hanya diberikan 1 contoh evaluasi dari 1 abstrak. Tugas Anda adalah mengevaluasi maksimal 2 abstrak.

Abstract 1: The effects of instructors' use of online discussions strategies on student participation and performance in university online introductory mathematics courses by Ji-Eun Lee & Mimi Recker

This study examines instructor strategies for designing and participating in online discussions and how these strategies influence their students' participation and course performance in university introductory online mathematics courses. The study leveraged data and text mining techniques to examine five years of online discussion data automatically collected by a Learning Management System from 72 introductory online mathematics courses involving over 2800 instructors and students who collectively contributed over 22,000 posts. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis of instructor strategies revealed four instructor participation variables (open-ended discussion, grading, discussion setting, elaborated feedback) that impacted student course performance and nine that did not. Further, students in courses where instructors used open-ended discussion prompts and graded posts had higher average final course grades. An examination of how instructor discussion strategies influenced student participation found that subgroups of students with lower average final course grades tended to engage in less online speaking and listening, while also contributing more posts categorized as social interactions and fewer related to course content. Students in subgroups with higher average final course grades tended to engage in more online listening and contributed more posts coded as higher in knowledge construction.

Aspect Konten Nilai - Alasan
Introduction This study focuses on strategies applied by instructor in designing and participating in online discussion in Mathematic courses. Besides, it also focuses on the effects of strategies on students' participation and performance. 3 - the authors inform the background of the study clearly.
Methodology The authors examined their research variables through Learning Management System. Data were processed through text mining. 2 - methodology provided does not describe the whole design of the research.
Result Students whose grades are below average are found less active in online speaking and listening while students with higher grades are found to be more active in online speaking and listening 3 - the results are very clear and concise
Contribution As I plan to conduct research on technology in education for my thesis, then this research can be beneficial for my study in terms of theory it produces. It (this journal) informs me that students whose grades are below average tend to be less active. Therefore, I should carefully design an approach that can enhance lower grade students' participation. Furthermore, I get some technical terms regarding technology that is potentially be applied in education such as Learning Management System. As the authors do not explain it in detail, therefore I try to find it on the internet. Therefore, this journal has encouraged me to find and learn more about a system or technology that can potentially be applied in my thesis.